diff --git a/packages/content-handler/test/data/substack-with-static-tweets-newsletter.html b/packages/content-handler/test/data/substack-with-static-tweets-newsletter.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..53076d11b --- /dev/null +++ b/packages/content-handler/test/data/substack-with-static-tweets-newsletter.html @@ -0,0 +1,3270 @@ + +
+| + | + | + | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| + |
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ + Nick Cammarata On Jhana +++ ... ++
+
+
+
+
+ + Buddhists say that if you meditate enough, you can learn to + enter a state of extreme bliss called jhana. + ++ (there are many different jhana states - there’s a discussion of the distinctions here + - but I’m lumping them together for simplicity. For + attempted explanations of why jhana should exist, see here and here.) + ++ Jhana is different from enlightenment. Enlightenment changes + you forever. Jhana is just a state you can enter during + meditation sessions, then leave when the session is over. + Enlightenment takes years or decades of work, but some people + describe reaching jhana after a few months of practice. + Hardcore Buddhists insist that jhana is good only insofar as + it serves as a stepping stone to enlightenment; others may + find extreme bliss desirable in its own right. + ++ Nick Cammarata + of OpenAI sometimes meditates and reaches jhana. I’ve + found his descriptions unusually, well, descriptive: + +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ @rgblong @algekalipso
+ one obvious thing is jhana but it's such a simple state
+ it's hard to compare to normal life, just different
+ axes. Best comparable I have for jhana is sex (many
+ people compare these) bc they're surprisingly similar.
+ Jhana killed my desire for casual sex bc it's 10-100x
+ better
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ @rgblong @algekalipso
+ or said differently, if I could have my max ideal
+ everything is 100% perfect casual sex fantasy situation,
+ any partner or set of partners etc (but none in a
+ romantic relationship) or sit in quiet in jhana I'd
+ definitely do the latter
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ @rgblong @algekalipso
+ jhana made me not crave pleasure so much anymore. Cured
+ that "addiction" via surplus. So I don't
+ actually do it that much, and I usually forget that I
+ can do it (this is common) rather than having to limit
+ myself. Much prefer not be in pain and just live a
+ normal peaceful day
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ @rgblong @algekalipso
+ the best analogy I have is if you're extremely thirsty
+ you'd do anything for water but if you're barely thirsty
+ it's kind of just nice and helpful. And you certainly
+ wouldn't break a bone for it. Pre jhana I was always
+ "thirsty" for feeling good, now I'm a lot less
+ so
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ @algekalipso @rgblong
+ any idea why it reduces cravings for pleasure so much
+ rather than just causing addiction? It's very strange
+ that 1. happiness buttons are real and you can press
+ them whenever with ~only positive side effects 2.
+ they're so non-addictive that you forget about
+ them
+
+ + And he links to others with similar perspectives: + + +
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ Jhana practice is making me pretty weird. I’m
+ blissing put in macys. After ~2 hour practice session
+ today, I did an errand and went to macys for a duvet. Uhh,
+ my senses are heightened and touching fabric feels as
+ intense as sex… and all my pleasures just echo and
+ grow inside me
+
+ + In other words: jhana is incredibly blissful, orders of + magnitude better than even amazing sex. With enough meditation + ability, you can access it on demand, with no side effects. + But it isn’t addictive; Nick maintains a normal job and + social life. As far as I know, he doesn’t steal from his + friends to buy more incense and meditation cushions. In fact, + jhana is so non-reinforcing that Nick often + “forgets” it’s even an option. + ++ We’ve been talking recently about the difference + between happiness and reinforcement (cf wanting vs. liking). If jhana works the way that Nick and others describe it, + then it’s an extreme example of this distinction - + almost maximally pleasurable, but with disproportionately + little (zero?) reinforcement value. I don’t think + normal models of reward have a good explanation here. + ++ This is one reason I’m still interested in Qualia + Research Institute ideas like the Symmetry Theory of Valence, even though there are some strong objections to them. I interpret QRI as coming at the problem from the + opposite direction as everyone else: normal neuroscience + starts with normal brain behavior and tries to build on it + until they can one day explain crazy things like jhana; QRI + starts with crazy things like jhana and tries to build down + until they can explain ordinary behavior. This is naturally + going to be shakier and harder to research - but somebody + should be trying it. + ++ Discussion questions: + +
+
+ + Thanks for subscribing to + Astral Codex Ten. This post is public, so feel free to share it. + ++ Share + +
|
+ + |